Home
>
Comparison
>
Cyberhaven vs Forcepoint

Why Teams Choose Cyberhaven over Forcepoint

1

Comprehensive Data Lineage

Tracks data origins, transformations, and movements across systems with content inspection and context. Forcepoint relies solely on content inspection, missing critical contextual insights.

2

Endpoint Performance

Cyberhaven’s endpoint agents are stable and lightweight. Forcepoint customers report significant instability and resource consumption at the endpoint, frustrating users and interrupting work.

3

Unified Modern Solution

Cyberhaven combines DLP and IRM functionalities in one modern DDR platform, eliminating the complexity of Forcepoint’s fragmented product portfolio.

Recognized Innovator

Cyberhaven beat everyone else in security to the punch with data lineage. Being able to surface critical content without having to painstakingly configure alerts has turned me into a zealot for this technology.

Kirkland & Ellis

See CyberHave A-Ha Moments

Lorem Ipsum 1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse lacinia aliquam cursus. Nunc ornare laoreet enim, non laoreet nisi euismod a. Integer elementum tellus vitae.

Lorem Ipsum 2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse lacinia aliquam cursus. Nunc ornare laoreet enim, non laoreet nisi euismod a. Integer elementum tellus vitae.

Lorem Ipsum 3

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse lacinia aliquam cursus. Nunc ornare laoreet enim, non laoreet nisi euismod a. Integer elementum tellus vitae.

Lorem Ipsum 4

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse lacinia aliquam cursus. Nunc ornare laoreet enim, non laoreet nisi euismod a. Integer elementum tellus vitae.

Detailed Comparison

Feature Comparison

As of Dec 15, 2024

What Cyberhaven Has

What Forcepoint Doesn’t Have

Unified Modern Solution

Combines DLP and IRM in a single, purpose-built DDR platform designed for today’s needs.

Relies on a fragmented product portfolio from years of mergers, creating operational inefficiencies.

Comprehensive Data Lineage

Tracks the full lifecycle of data with content and context, providing complete visibility.

Lacks data lineage capabilities; relies only on content inspection for DLP functionality.

Reduced False Positives

Reduces false positives by over 90%, saving analysts time and improving accuracy.

Content-only approach leads to high false positive rates, increasing operational overhead.

Cloud-Native Advantage

Built for modern cloud environments, ensuring seamless integration and scalability.

Core DLP offering remains rooted in legacy on-premises technology with high maintenance needs.

Lower Total Cost of Ownership

Reduces costs with minimal maintenance and a unified platform that simplifies operations.

Higher TCO due to legacy technical debt, high false positive rates, and complex maintenance requirements.

Actionable Insights

Provides detailed insights into data risk with advanced lineage visualization tools.

Offers limited insights; fragmented tools lack visualization or unified risk management.

Enhanced Blocking Capabilities

Stops data exfiltration across multiple channels with precision, leveraging context and content.

Blocking relies heavily on predefined policies and lacks granularity for modern use cases.