Home
>
Comparison
>
Cyberhaven vs Code42

Why Teams Choose Cyberhaven over Code42

1

Comprehensive data lineage

Cyberhaven tracks the full history of data, including content and context, providing a complete understanding of sensitivity and risk. Code42 lacks content inspection and offers only limited contextual data at the file level.

2

DLP and IRM in one

Cyberhaven is a modern DDR solution, combining the best of DLP and IRM in a single platform. Code42 is primarily a monitoring tool with limited IRM capabilities and only basic blocking.

3

Uses both content and context

Code42 does not inspect content, while Cyberhaven combines content inspection and data lineage for superior classification accuracy, reducing false positives.

Recognized Innovator

Staying ahead of the competition means guarding against insider threats. Cyberhaven gives us visibility into how data flows within our company and stops insider threats in real time.

Motorola

See CyberHave A-Ha Moments

Lorem Ipsum 1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse lacinia aliquam cursus. Nunc ornare laoreet enim, non laoreet nisi euismod a. Integer elementum tellus vitae.

Lorem Ipsum 2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse lacinia aliquam cursus. Nunc ornare laoreet enim, non laoreet nisi euismod a. Integer elementum tellus vitae.

Lorem Ipsum 3

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse lacinia aliquam cursus. Nunc ornare laoreet enim, non laoreet nisi euismod a. Integer elementum tellus vitae.

Lorem Ipsum 4

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse lacinia aliquam cursus. Nunc ornare laoreet enim, non laoreet nisi euismod a. Integer elementum tellus vitae.

Detailed Comparison

Feature Comparison

As of Dec 15, 2024

What Cyberhaven Has

What Code42 Doesn’t Have

Comprehensive Data Lineage

Tracks the full history of files, combining content and context for complete visibility.

No full file history or data lineage; relies only on limited file-level context.

Granular Blocking Capabilities

Stops data exfiltration across a wide variety of channels with precision.

Blocking is blunt and limited, ineffective for desktop apps and broader exfiltration scenarios.

Content Inspection

Supports advanced techniques like Exact Data Matching (EDM) and Optical Character Recognition (OCR).

No native content inspection capabilities.

Data Classification Accuracy

Reduces false positives with precise classification using both lineage and content.

Lacks comprehensive classification, leading to more false positives and missed risks.

Exfiltration Channel Coverage

Protects data across endpoints, cloud apps, and desktop apps for broader risk coverage.

Narrow focus on file actions; fails to address diverse exfiltration methods like encryption.

Data Retention

Offers 13+ months of retention with additional options.

Maximum 180 days with limited tier options.

Policy Management

Allows backtesting and customization of policies.

Rigid, pre-defined policies with limited adaptability.

Timeliness

Real-time event reporting and policy updates.

Event reporting delays of 5-20 minutes.

Integrated and Robust Platform

Combines DLP and IRM in a unified platform for comprehensive data security.

Primarily a monitoring tool with limited blocking and no full integration of DLP and IRM.